From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jun 27 06:41:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA13363 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 06:41:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA13358 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 06:41:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA20243; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 13:41:37 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id PAA13927; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 15:41:36 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980627154135.62194@follo.net> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 15:41:35 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: ac199@hwcn.org, Sue Blake Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Concurrent package making allowed? References: <19980627125701.16222@welearn.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Tim Vanderhoek on Sat, Jun 27, 1998 at 01:10:58AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jun 27, 1998 at 01:10:58AM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > I happen to know that I won't get far with staroffice xemacs or kirc, > > but that's luck. Not all ports called x can be discounted either. > > Hm. I'm not so sure about xemacs. It might work without X, > actually.... Don't bother trying---it's still emacs, either way. ;) Emacs is nice :-) XEmacs works in console mode, and is actually nicer in console mode than the regular emacs. I've yet to decide whether it is nicer in X; it has pros (graphics support) and cons (the clipboard handling SUCKS - separate clipboards that 'sometimes' mesh. GNU Emacs handles it nicely...) Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message