From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 20:52:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D281637B401; Mon, 5 May 2003 20:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net (puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C53B43FB1; Mon, 5 May 2003 20:52:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0018.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.192.18] helo=mindspring.com) by puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19CtVE-0006Na-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 20:52:29 -0700 Message-ID: <3EB73128.B7FBCF5A@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 20:51:04 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Schultz References: <20030505170121.GA7950@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4ffba6897e8abd779d03234e628fd3091667c3043c0873f7e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: open source license with 24 month proprietary clause X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 03:52:33 -0000 David Schultz wrote: > > Then after the 24 months that code becomes part of the public code base. > > The easiest way to do this is to attach a restrictive license or > no license to your code for the first 24 months, then release it > under a less restrictive license such as the BSD license. For > most purposes, you don't need an uber-license that covers the > terms both before and after the 24-month period. It's your code, > so you can change the distribution terms as you see fit (aside > from being able to revoke privileges granted by an earlier > license.) Actually, without an exchange of consideration, the license you are using is not a contract anyway, so it is always revokable, unless someone pays you money for a source tape or something. -- Terry