Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2022 19:29:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 264454] Do not build TEST_DEPENDS in case NO_TEST is set and do not run tests Message-ID: <bug-264454-7788-95CqdRRW9b@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-264454-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-264454-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D264454 Stefan E=C3=9Fer <se@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |se@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Stefan E=C3=9Fer <se@FreeBSD.org> --- I had already commented on NO_TEST before: Why do we need NO_TEST at all? If TEST_DEPENDS are built without "make test" being invoked, there is a pro= blem in bsd.port.mk or some other ports system component. This could apply to e.g. "make package-recursive", if it did build and pack= age TEST_DEPENDS, but it does not! I do not know of a single port operation that recurses into the TEST_DEPEND= S, without this being specifically required to support "make test". And regarding the Joules wasted on needless port and package building: there are tools that optimize the update process (poudriere, portmaster, portupgr= ade, ...). They prevent needless rebuilds of ports that did not change since the last build cycle. Always rebuilding all relevant ports at a fixed schedule witho= ut checking whether there have been any updates to the port - that's a waste of Joules! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-264454-7788-95CqdRRW9b>