Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:38:25 -0500
From:      Dan D Niles <dan@more.net>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Extended VLAN?
Message-ID:  <1271259505.9196.26.camel@jane.spg.more.net>
In-Reply-To: <1271257872.9196.6.camel@jane.spg.more.net>
References:  <1271196264.10895.33.camel@jane.spg.more.net> <g2wd36406631004140106ob10bf223r364655ac1906d1aa@mail.gmail.com> <1271257872.9196.6.camel@jane.spg.more.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 10:11 -0500, Dan D Niles wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 09:06 +0100, krad wrote:
> > it sounds stupid but is the bridge up?
> > 
> > ie do a ifconfig bridge0 up
> 
> Yes, the bridge is up.  Still no love.
> 
> I watched the traffic with wireshark.  All I see is arp requests with no
> response.   Do I need to run an arp daemon to forward arp requests
> across the tunnel?
> 

OK, this is weird.  I ran wireshark on the destination side (across the
bridge).  When I try to ping the destination router, the arp request is
sent across the bridge, but there is no arp reply.

It seems like the destination router is not responding to arp requests
that come in over the bridge.

> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1271259505.9196.26.camel>