From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 15 18:28:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEAA16A415 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F0413C44B for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-65-69-140-8.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.69.140.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B36114307 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:22:56 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:28:46 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <23EA4587FDDD36F0DF73270C@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <1168882202.74258.16.camel@matrix.corp.megared.net.mx> References: <1168882202.74258.16.camel@matrix.corp.megared.net.mx> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7b1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========4A128BF1CA32F6E169DB==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Antivirus. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:28:49 -0000 --==========4A128BF1CA32F6E169DB========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On January 15, 2007 11:30:02 AM -0600 Luis Croker=20 wrote: > > Hi all... > > I have a mail server running FreeBSD+sendmail, I would like to > install an antivirus for the mail traffic. > > Any suggestions about an antivirus non-commercial to install ? > We tested clamav alongside two commercial scanners and found clamav to be=20 as accurate as the best of the commercials. Clamav is all we run at our=20 gateway now. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========4A128BF1CA32F6E169DB==========--