From owner-freebsd-current Sat Sep 16 09:27:21 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA07624 for current-outgoing; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 09:27:21 -0700 Received: from server.netcraft.co.uk (server.netcraft.co.uk [194.72.238.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA07619 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 09:27:16 -0700 Received: (from paul@localhost) by server.netcraft.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA03380; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 17:26:42 +0100 From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199509161626.RAA03380@server.netcraft.co.uk> Subject: Re: libforms - thumbs up or down? To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 17:26:41 +0100 (BST) Cc: paul@FreeBSD.org, current@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199509161618.SAA01383@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Sep 16, 95 06:18:37 pm Reply-to: paul@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 910 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to J Wunsch who said > > > > > How are you getting libdialog linked with libforms? I guess there's no reason > > not to have this be possible but it was not intended to be that way. > > Libforms is meant to ultimately replace libdialog. The example certainly > > doesn't link with libdialog, are you trying to use something you've knocked > > together yourself? > > All i did was a cvs checkout, followed by a make. So it must be in > the checked in version of example/Makefile. Also, i cannot see where > any other draw_box() would be defined (only declared, in the header). Hmm, OK. Clear bit rot taken place I think. I've removed libdialog from the example and it now compiles and runs. Not a very interesting example really but it works now. -- Paul Richards, Netcraft Ltd. Internet: paul@netcraft.co.uk, http://www.netcraft.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1225 447500 (work)