From owner-freebsd-security Thu Apr 19 18:20:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from urdvg002.cms.usa.net (urdvg002.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E242737B424 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:20:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from briant@packeteer.com) Received: (qmail 25327 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2001 01:20:09 -0000 Received: from uadvg128.cms.usa.net (165.212.11.128) by corprelay.cms.usa.net with SMTP; 20 Apr 2001 01:20:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 13496 invoked by uid 0); 20 Apr 2001 01:20:08 -0000 Received: USA.NET MXFirewall, messaging filters applied; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 01:20:07 GMT Received: from packeteer.com [207.78.98.2] by uadvg128 (ASMTP/briant@postoffice.packeteer.com) via mtad (53CM.0401.1.03) with ESMTP id 068FDTBuc0204M16; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 01:20:03 GMT Message-ID: <3ADF8EFB.1B6EBA04@packeteer.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:20:59 -0700 From: Brian Tiemann Organization: Packeteer, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Rob Simmons , Ben Vaughn , Chris Faulhaber , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another glob problem References: <20010419164947.M72854-100000@mail.wlcg.com> <3ADF7BDD.A7868DA@packeteer.com> <20010419180118.C54774@xor.obsecurity.org> <3ADF8C73.7E987982@packeteer.com> <20010419181459.B57373@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yes, I cvsupped immediately before rebuilding. That's the entire problem. The current best attempt has been to remove /usr/src and /usr/obj, cvsup to checkout a fresh 4-STABLE tree as of this afternoon, and try to build libc. But that's not working. So while what's causing libc to not compile is probably not related to the patch, what it means is that we're all effectively left without a solution to the ftpd overflow problem until the build error in mpool.c is dealt with. I cvsup 4-STABLE every night. I sort of thought that was what "tracking -STABLE" meant. It's so I don't have to worry about downloading patches. Brian Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 06:10:11PM -0700, Brian Tiemann wrote: > > Well, that's great, but something needs to be looked at for those of us > > tracking 4-STABLE. Thanks... > > If you're tracking -stable, why not just cvsup? We can't possibly > test the patches with every possible different point on the RELENG_4 > continuum, so we kind of assume that if you've cvsupped once to get to > a non-release version of -stable you can do it again. Having said > that, I can't think of any differences in libc which would have caused > this to fail between 4.2-REL and some later version of 4.2-STABLE. > > Kris > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message