From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Sep 13 00:29:31 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA29713
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA29708
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA13050; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Alexey Pialkin <pialkin@abel.pdmi.ras.ru>
cc: ache@nagual.ru (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=),
        spblug@tsctube.spb.su, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ATAPI patch 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Sep 1996 10:41:00 +0400."
             <199609130641.KAA27799@abel.pdmi.ras.ru> 
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:28:22 -0700
Message-ID: <13048.842599702@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I don't sure about anything :) For example - my Panasonic 572B doesn't need
> any delays at all.But GoldStar does.So i don't realy know which one are 
> neccessary and which not :( 

I think what he was wondering was whether you'd managed to make the
GoldStar work with any *less* delays, e.g. is each and every one of them
known to be necessary?

					Jordan