From owner-freebsd-arch  Tue Sep 18 12:36:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-104-168.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.168])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45BC37B40F
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E155A66D46; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:36:00 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>,
	Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>,
	Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Moving UUCP to ports
Message-ID: <20010918123600.A49263@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20010917235356.A41864@xor.obsecurity.org> <200109181920.f8IJKln67463@gits.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200109181920.f8IJKln67463@gits.dyndns.org>; from clefevre@citeweb.net on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:20:47PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:20:47PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> [snip]
> > No-one has been maintaining UUCP in FreeBSD for the past several years
> > (do a quick search on open PRs), but if someone suddenly wanted to
> > they can maintain the port just as easily (easier, since anyone in the
> > world can be a port maintainer, whereas you have to be a committer to
> > maintain code in the base system).
>=20
> IMHO, your assertion is wrong, since anybody could sumbit a PR as
> anybody do to update a port w/o commiter rights.

Isn't that what I said?

Kris

--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7p6IgWry0BWjoQKURAtCHAJ4y2hlolvWs2iHCnrGm0zDfpsclMgCgnUGc
hvxbARSgwzdO/C6RnZN6QbM=
=D9JI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message