Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:06:49 -0500
From:      "Steven E. Ames" <steve@virtual-voodoo.com>
To:        "Gregory Neil Shapiro" <gshapiro@gshapiro.net>, "Peter Wemm" <peter@netplex.com.au>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sendmail Makefile 
Message-ID:  <05e601c01dbe$277ed870$8a1a050a@winstar.com>
References:  <14783.46656.379284.570690@horsey.gshapiro.net><200009131756.e8DHutG95016@netplex.com.au><14783.50459.632660.903538@horsey.gshapiro.net><03de01c01db2$8e7aa380$8a1a050a@winstar.com><14783.52634.965325.92315@horsey.gshapiro.net> <14783.56409.352035.774184@horsey.gshapiro.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> steve> Is SASL the only possible sendmail module that might be used?
This way
> steve> is pretty SASL specific...
>
> gshapiro> No, there are others but each has to be specific.  Each has
their
> gshapiro> own -DXXX item to turn on the functionality and each may
have
> gshapiro> it's own include files or library file(s).  However, when it
> gshapiro> comes to the more esoteric modules, the user is probably
better
> gshapiro> off downloading the open source and building by hand.
>
> Or perhaps what you were thinking about would be make.conf variables:
>
> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=
> SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=
> SENDMAIL_LDADD=
>
> Where .../sendmail/Makefile would have:
>
> CFLAGS+=${SENDMAIL_CFLAGS}
> LDFLAGS+=${SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS}
> LDADD+=${SENDMAIL_LDADD}
>
> Then users would:
>
> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL
> SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib
> SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl

Yep. That's more along the lines of my thinking. Nor as intuitive from a
user persepective maybe, but certainly more flexible.

-Steve



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?05e601c01dbe$277ed870$8a1a050a>