From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 4 06:51:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B1416A404 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 06:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5115913C480 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 06:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id QAA20775; Fri, 4 May 2007 16:51:06 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:51:05 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <463AD28B.9070709@samsco.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "Sean C. Farley" , Ulrich Spoerlein Subject: Re: acd and iostat [was Re: FreeBSD vs Region Code DVDs] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 06:51:23 -0000 On Fri, 4 May 2007, Scott Long wrote: > Ian Smith wrote: > > On Thu, 3 May 2007, Scott Long wrote: > > > > > Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > [..] > > > > PS: why is iostat(1) not working for acd(4) devices? > > > > > > Because acd doesn't make use of the standard kernel facilities that make > > > iostat work. It's a deliberate choice by the driver author. > > > > Same for systat -vm of course. I guess this was a regression, as acdX > > used to show up fine in 4.X in {sys,io}stat, whether or not also showing > > cdX (with atapicam). I often used to watch it while testing burned CDs. > > > > Was that because of an API change to said kernel facilities, perhaps? > > > > Cheers, Ian > > > > No, the devstat kernel API hasn't changed in since it was introduced > nearly 10 years ago. Thanks. The only other reason I can see for removing acdX from these stats would be to save on some admittedly precious screen real estate. Cheers, Ian