Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 21:24:15 -0500 From: Gary Palmer <gjp@in-addr.com> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ``how to'' for Vinum and mirroring after the volume was created? Message-ID: <41935.946261455@noop.colo.erols.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 27 Dec 1999 12:31:24 %2B1030." <19991227123124.U1316@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey wrote in message ID <19991227123124.U1316@freebie.lemis.com>: > It occurs to me that it is, in fact, correct to read from a volume > being revived. The data is consistent up to the point where the > revive has progressed, so the system can read from this area. Why would it be reading from the reviving plex? The volume wasn't mounted when I was watching the stats, so the only i/o should have been the revive. (Yes, I'm paranoid :) ) > Hmm. This looks too VERITAS-like for my liking. In addition, this > isn't a flag. Internally it's represented as a plex index, with -1 > meaning "round robin". Aaah. That makes sense. > I've tried to keep away from this sort of stuff. Unfortunately a beast as complicated as a LVM has to have the ability to change the way it works on the fly. > The second example is supposed to set round robin. I don't like that > syntax either. Maybe the second example should be just > > vinum prefer volfoo. vinum prefer volfoo none That runs into problems with people calling plexes `none', but in that case they get what they deserve ;) vinum prefer volfoo "" There is some precedent for the null string being used for stuff like this. I can't think of them offhand, but some unix programs take that sort of flag. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41935.946261455>