From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri Oct 3 05:06:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA09287 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 05:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA09282 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 05:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gurney.reilly.home (d10.syd2.zeta.org.au [203.26.11.10]) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA14883; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 22:00:42 +1000 Received: (from andrew@localhost) by gurney.reilly.home (8.8.7/8.8.5) id VAA02092; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 21:57:58 +1000 (EST) From: Andrew Reilly Message-Id: <199710031157.VAA02092@gurney.reilly.home> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 21:57:58 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: New SCSI Framework Patches Available To: gibbs@plutotech.com cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199710030340.VAA13129@pluto.plutotech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 2 Oct, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > Supported peripherals: > > Direct Access driver (da): > 512 byte sectored disk drivers. Support for other sector sizes is > planned, but further investigation on the "right" approach for this > is needed. It probably belongs in the disk-slice code. Pardon for the unhelpful intrusion, but could someone please explain the issue here? I have hopes that one day my Fujitsu MO drive will be able to use 2k-sector media. Is the problem that much of the code calculates size information in sectors, (perhaps for 32-bit length restriction reasons?) and these sizes will not be appropriate for the information stored in them if the sectors themselves are not all the same size? Would it hurt (in a system that wished to use 2k-sector media on at least one drive) to use 2k sectors for all da drives, even if that meant multiple-sector writes were done as one? -- Andrew "The steady state of disks is full." -- Ken Thompson