From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 9 01:08:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB2F106566B for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 01:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322348FC0C for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 01:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NTPo5-0001Lz-W3 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:07:57 +0100 Received: from 93-138-40-75.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.138.40.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:07:57 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 93-138-40-75.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:07:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:07:34 +0100 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-138-40-75.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090612) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: Help test softupdates journaling (SUJ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:08:00 -0000 Jeff Roberson wrote: > Hello, > > I have been augmenting softupdates with a small journal that will be > processed in lieu of fsck in the event of a crash. I have written some > about this project here: http://jeffr_tech.livejournal.com/ Good news! > For now I need volunteers who will attempt to crash the kernel code. It > now passes fsx, fsstress, and stress2 on my box for many hours. pho@ > has been helping me and may still have a bug or two but I need a wider > audience so we can be comfortable with the stability. In a week or so I > will also provide the checker. Until then a full fsck is required after > a crash. Hi, Do you mean that journal replay/recovery is implemented but not 100% working yet so a fsck is needed or that it is still missing?