Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:11:03 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Cc: Dejan Lesjak <lesi@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/gpsdrive pkg-plist ports/audio/gqmpeg-devel pkg-plist ports/databases/pgworksheet pkg-plist ports/deskutils/hot-babe pkg-plist ports/deskutils/xchm pkg-plist ports/editors/abiword-devel pkg-plist ports/games/crimson ... Message-ID: <20050615141103.lupteudmxccko4ww@netchild.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <200506151352.48180.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> References: <200506150243.j5F2habT053985@repoman.freebsd.org> <200506151217.05514.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20050615131035.wyn4a6julw80ow4c@netchild.homeip.net> <200506151352.48180.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> wrote: > Well, if they are empty, why not? It is actually rather unavoidable. I could > be missing something, but this is how I understand things: Technically we don't need to update the revisions, but our policy (as far as I understand it) is: if the plist changes, we bump the revision. I will not complain if you don't bump the revisions of affected ports (e.g. when nobody else thinks the ports need a revision bump), I just mentioned the common practice so far. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon. -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050615141103.lupteudmxccko4ww>