From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jan 19 21:36:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225E637B41D for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:36:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0K5aTs82218; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:36:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 23:36:29 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Terry Lambert Cc: Alp Atici , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.x Message-ID: <20020120053629.GE81627@dan.emsphone.com> References: <3C4A53EE.B882356C@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C4A53EE.B882356C@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Jan 19), Terry Lambert said: > Alp Atici wrote: > > Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x > > series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0 > > (or up)? > > I think that the cut over will happen after the compiler > no longer core dumps on: > > main() > { > int i; > > i = foo(); > > switch( i) { > default: > printf( "hello, stupid compiler!\n"); > break; > } > } > > int > foo() > { > return( 6); > } Doesn't core on me (gcc30+bounds-checking port, FreeBSD-current). In fact, I've got USE_GCC30 in my make.conf and build all my ports with it (at least the ports that aren't broken and hardcode cc or gcc). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message