From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 10 01:46:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 167D516A4CE; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:46:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com (imo-m21.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6964C43D31; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:46:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com)
Received: from Tm4528@aol.com
	by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id n.146.3c05bd16 (3964);
	Sun, 9 Jan 2005 20:46:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Tm4528@aol.com
Message-ID: <146.3c05bd16.2f133865@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 20:46:13 EST
To: rwatson@freebsd.org, tedm@toybox.placo.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
cc: questions@freebsd.org
cc: dave@horsfall.org
cc: kris@obsecurity.org
Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.3 Performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:46:23 -0000

I find in amazing that a discussion of how FreeBSD 5.3 sucks compared to 4.x 
can segue into an discussion of FreeBSD vs Windows. I guess thats the politics 
of computing. And also a commentary on the mentality of the kind of person 
that uses FreeBSD.