From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:19:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9154E16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:19:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CABC43D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:19:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peadar.edwards@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so73869wri for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:19:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ks6iYXrZ6Dbcd+o6bGPgaShAUM4UYbo0wXR9eIRUPQNB9dmCGhdBn/8S6o9SlDy/f+Uwhtk0yQu7lsmYm/cctRCSmo2zrOgPP/LSNf7iKUzhCdWIVuAePgF5MhgoO/IySxOBtiK2i2esbXWnaAdiHVFNShH5esudhbtTeP+wu8Y= Received: by 10.54.8.35 with SMTP id 35mr36476wrh; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:19:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.57.76 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:19:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <34cb7c840501060919155fc460@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:19:17 +0000 From: Peter Edwards To: Julian Elischer , re@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41DC953C.2030209@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200501052101.j05L139i085802@freefall.freebsd.org> <41DC953C.2030209@elischer.org> Subject: Re: kern/66248: [panic] bootloader is confused by booting from USB flash, trashes main drives boot block X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: peadar@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:19:18 -0000 On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:32:44 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > Not sure, but this may want to go into 4.11? > Is the bug in that as well? It's certainly present in 4.x: the code is pretty much the same, except for the merge of the SIO/non-SIO version into one source, and the ensuing change of comments (I assume so the C++ preprocessor could be used)