Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:14:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, "Matt M." <matt@boda.virtualave.net>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lynx build issue Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004121912520.11658-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004122059200.59241-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why? Has w3m been cleared of buffer overflows?
None are known, even though the source looks dangerous. Lynx, on the other
hand, has known problems.
FYI, I use w3m quite happily, except that sometimes it garbles up the
frame rendering.
Kris
----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004121912520.11658-100000>