From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 16 13:21:43 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53DB16A418
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net)
Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net
	(66-230-99-27-cdsl-rb1.nwc.acsalaska.net [66.230.99.27])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9067813C428
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8679E1CC97
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 16 Sep 2007 05:21:42 -0800 (AKDT)
From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:21:38 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <20070913153630.GA9448@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
	<BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCCEGHCAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
	<20070916020126.06cf26ac@gumby.homeunix.com.>
In-Reply-To: <20070916020126.06cf26ac@gumby.homeunix.com.>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200709161521.39955.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
Subject: Re: /dev/random question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:21:43 -0000

On Sunday 16 September 2007 03:01:26 RW wrote:

> Essentially what has happened is that /dev/random has been abandoned in
> favour of a better /dev/urandom, and that seems to be a bit high-handed
> to me.

Not high-handed. Logical. The difference between /dev/random and /dev/urandom 
was that /dev/random could block IO if it didn't have enough entropy 
and /dev/urandom guaranteed to not block. The underlying algorithm creating 
the random was at the discretion of the implementers.
So what you had was a highway (urandom) and a road with traffic lights 
(random). The need for the traffic lights has been removed, so there is no 
logic in not calling it a highway. People travelling the random road, will 
simply account for the possibility a traffic light comes up, which never 
does.

-- 
Mel