From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 16 18:41:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8176716A4CE for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:41:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3184A43D2F for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:41:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl) Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018) id 633EE347116; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:40:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:40:51 +0100 From: Pawel Malachowski To: Maxim Konovalov Message-ID: <20050216184051.GA30070@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> References: <200502161520.j1GFKGiU037098@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200502161520.j1GFKGiU037098@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/77570: [PATCH] ipfw: Multiple rules may have the same number. X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:41:48 -0000 On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 03:20:16PM +0000, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > I thought it was some kind of a side effect in rule manipulation code, but > > if some reasons push people to use this feature, feel free to close this PR > > (and thanks for reaction). > > This is just my opinion. I'd suggest to discuss your patch in -net or > -ipfw maillists and ask people what they think. I would vote this is a feature, not a bug. I personally rely on this behaviour in some of my ipfw rulesets. -- Paweł Małachowski