From owner-cvs-all  Wed Sep 23 16:51:36 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA11101
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA11093;
          Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca5-31.ix.netcom.com [209.109.234.31]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA18927; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id QAA08099; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199809232351.QAA08099@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
To: freebsd@xaa.iae.nl
CC: smace@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <19980923182402.A518@xaa.iae.nl> (message from Mark Huizer on Wed, 23 Sep 1998 18:24:02 +0200)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libslang/pkg PLIST
From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Aha, well, gosh, I suppose that means I'm not needed as a maintainer
 * anymore? I thought that meant somehow that you would be partly related
 * to this particular port, so that it had any use sending patches to do
 * this very same job? But well, gosh, well, no why not just take your own
 * patch and not even contact the maintainer or whatever.
 * 
 * If so, do please change the MAINTAINER so I won't get ppl asking me
 * stuff about it, when I have nothing to do with the stuff.
 * 
 * And while you're add it, just close ports/8012 which might be a little
 * useless at this moment in time.

Sorry about that.  Many committers are working around-the-clock (well
they are all over the world, right? :) now to get as many ELF ports
ready for 3.0R as possible.  There may be cases when they somehow
overlook PRs.  Again, sorry about that.

That said, the PR in question has the following in the audit-trail:

===
>Audit-Trail:
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->smace
Responsible-Changed-By: smace
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Sep 22 13:00:41 PDT 1998
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll take this one
>Unformatted:
===

A notice for that should have been sent to you so it's hard for me to
understand why you got the impression that your PR has been ignored.
Actually it's not -- hub has been dropping mails lately, so you
probably just didn't get it.  Right? :)

Satoshi