From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 17 08:01:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA18136
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 08:01:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA18127
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 08:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA08218; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 09:03:39 -0700
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 09:03:39 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199601171603.JAA08218@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: John Beukema <john@gateway.net.hk>
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Yet another PPP question
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960117220633.9082A-100000@gateway.net.hk>
References: <199601170511.WAA07206@rocky.sri.MT.net>
	<Pine.BSD/.3.91.960117220633.9082A-100000@gateway.net.hk>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Is not this CHAP and PAP which are pretty standard even if not in the RFC?
> I think it is hard to pretend MS is not there.

Nope, CHAP and PAP are supported by both versions of PPP in FreeBSD.


nate