From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 24 17:43:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B59136DA34 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCxPm2kQvz3cV6 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5D90336DC89; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5AB36DA97 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCxPm1sbsz3csr for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24AD3E4C1 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06OHhOFC058319 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 06OHhOjF058318 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248239] local_unbound: Fails to resolve europris.no fail after 11.3->11.4 upgrade Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.4-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ietf-dane@dukhovni.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:43:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248239 Viktor Dukhovni changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ietf-dane@dukhovni.org --- Comment #7 from Viktor Dukhovni --- If ed25519 is not supported in a resolver, it should treat zones that are signed only with ed25519 as "unsigned". If it instead ServFails, then that= 's a bug. What exactly happens with lookup for the reported zone? It's DS RRs list only ed25519: europris.no. IN DS 25323 15 2 ... europris.no. IN DS 25323 15 4 ... But its DNSKEY RRset has both P256 and ED25519 keys and is signed by all: europris.no. IN DNSKEY 257 3 15 ... europris.no. IN DNSKEY 256 3 15 ... europris.no. IN DNSKEY 257 3 13 ... europris.no. IN DNSKEY 256 3 13 ... europris.no. IN RRSIG DNSKEY 13 2 3600 14997 ... europris.no. IN RRSIG DNSKEY 13 2 3600 46820 ... europris.no. IN RRSIG DNSKEY 15 2 3600 25323 ... europris.no. IN RRSIG DNSKEY 15 2 3600 39946 ... The SOA is signed with both ZSKs: europris.no. IN SOA ns1.hyp.net. hostmaster@domeneshop.no. ... europris.no. IN RRSIG SOA 13 2 3600 14997 ... europris.no. IN RRSIG SOA 15 2 3600 39946 A resolver that does not support ed25519 should treat this zone as unsigned, since the DS RRs don't include any other algorithm. Perhaps with P256 in t= he DNSKEY RRset, the resolver failed to reach that conclusion? That would be a bug. Or does the resolver "think" it has ed25519 support, expecting it to work, = and then reports errors when loading ed25519 keys fails? While not having ed25519 is not a bug, failing to resolve DNSSEC domains th= at require ed25519 is a bug. So this looks prematurely closed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=