From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Sep 16 06:56:07 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id GAA27623 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 06:56:07 -0700 Received: from healer.com (healer-gw.Empire.Net [205.164.80.204]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA27618 ; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 06:56:00 -0700 Received: (from gryphon@localhost) by healer.com (8.6.11/8.6.9.1) id JAA07352; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 09:57:22 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 09:57:22 -0400 From: Coranth Gryphon Message-Id: <199509161357.JAA07352@healer.com> To: roberto@keltia.Freenix.FR, terry@lambert.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD suffer from the Intel RZ1000 IDE bug? Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, jehamby@lightside.com, questions@freebsd.org, R.L.Hesketh@ukc.ac.uk, sos@freebsd.org Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk From: Ollivier Robert > It seems that Terry Lambert said: > > > Less CPU load ? > > > > Is why you buy SCSI instead of IDE. > > I've been convinced of that for a long time and will never buy *IDE. The > problem is that most people don't realize that IDE is only a > money-only-short-term decision they pay one way or the other later. IDE has one real drawback, you can't chain anywhere near the same extent, so you really have to replace one drive with a larger drive for upgrades. Don't get me wrong, for a high-end machine, I'd go SCSI all the way. But for a machine where you do not head real fast disk access, and can live with a reasonable max of 2-3 Gig, SCSI can't compare to IDE for a cheap fast solution. And on older (486) machines, a VLB IDE controller still gives better performance (by observation, regardless of whether its technically possible). -coranth ------------------------------------------+------------------------+ Coranth Gryphon | "Faith Manages." | | - Satai Delenn | Phone: 603-598-3440 Fax: 603-598-3430 +------------------------+ USMail: 11 Carver St, Nashua, NH 03060 Disclaimer: All these words are yours, except Europa...