Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Jul 1998 17:41:44 +0900 (JST)
From:      HAMADA Naoki <hamada@astec.co.jp>
To:        smoergrd@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com
Cc:        mike@smith.net.au, hamada@astec.co.jp, sbabkin@dcn.att.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NIC drivers
Message-ID:  <199807170841.RAA01128@stone.astec.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Coidan Sm,Ax(Brgrav's message of "17 Jul 1998 10:01:09 %2B0200" <rx4lnps9a9m.fsf@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com>
References:  <199807162021.NAA03930@antipodes.cdrom.com> <rx4lnps9a9m.fsf@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Sm,Ax(Brgrav writes:
>Well, I don't have a -stable box right now, but from preliminary
>testing on my -current boxes, I'd recommend against it. I haven't had
>much time to track down the problem, but it would seem that a certain
>percentage of incoming packets go down a black hole.

Are the purged packets sane? If that is the case, the top packet
should not be discarded when an ERR_RX_INCOMPLETE is reported.  In my
environment, an ERR_RX_INCOMPLETE is so rare that I cannot make
sure...

- nao

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199807170841.RAA01128>