Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:10:19 GMT From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/102292: btraceback shouldn't be disabled in bacula-server Message-ID: <200608200210.k7K2AJic089001@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/102292; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Cc: Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com>
Subject: Re: ports/102292: btraceback shouldn't be disabled in bacula-server
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:08:23 -0400
On 19 Aug 2006 at 18:40, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Ugh. A patch of a patch looks horrible, don't it?
>
> Nutshell -- leave the btraceback lines in place. Don't remove them.
>
> Here's another attempt, but this is fugly ain't it?
Still not good here:
$ patch < ../patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
(Patch is indented 1 space.)
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
| --- files/patch-scripts-Makefile.in_orig Sat Aug 19 14:04:09
2006
| +++ files/patch-scripts-Makefile.in Sat Aug 19 18:37:58 2006
--------------------------
Patching file files/patch-scripts-Makefile.in using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 2.
patch: **** malformed patch at line 15: ${DESTDIR}${scriptdir}/mtx-
changer.old; \
[dan@polo:~/src/bacula-server] $
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200608200210.k7K2AJic089001>