From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 1 21:39:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B665022D632 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 21:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (mx2.dismail.de [159.69.191.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4896ts5QvGz46Xw for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 21:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8fdcf531; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 22:39:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9cbf62de; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 22:39:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1a93f9e2; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 22:39:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 71d8cf06 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 1 Feb 2020 22:39:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 16:39:41 -0500 From: ajtiM To: Kevin Oberman Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: openblas-0.3.7_1,1 error install Message-ID: <20200201163941.137f9122@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <2365de86-89a7-eba7-cf43-384990019353@gmail.com> <987f41fc-65e9-ebd6-4b8e-390b6837ecc0@FreeBSD.org> <20200131114201.717290fb@dismail.de> <20200131174723.528480a5@dismail.de> <0bb675ff-8324-3fa6-f6f6-379fda3fe406@FreeBSD.org> <20200131184939.57d4c048@dismail.de> <20200201064408.04a44f69@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4896ts5QvGz46Xw X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.89 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:159.69.191.136]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-2.19)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 159.69.0.0/16(0.53), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[136.191.69.159.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 21:39:50 -0000 On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 12:20:10 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote: > That is a configuration option, but the default is to use openblas. > The change was made a few months ago. >=20 > If you have built py-numpy from ports in the past, use "make -C > /usr/ports/math/py-numpy" to change the saved config to use > math/openblas. (NETLIB was the previous default which used cblas.) > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 >=20 >=20 > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 3:44 AM ajtiM via freebsd-ports < > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:49:39 -0500 > > ajtiM wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:29:10 -0500 > > > Steve Wills wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On 1/31/20 5:47 PM, ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ls -al /usr/local/lib/libopenblas* > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 32273330 Jan 31 10:45 > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 > > > > > root wheel 15492200 Jan 31 10:45 > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.so lrwxr-xr-x 1 > > > > > root wheel 29 Jan 31 10:45 > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.a -> libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.a > > > > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 30 Jan 31 10:45 > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.so -> > > > > > libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.so > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you seeing any other issues besides the complaint from > > > > portmaster? > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > For now I do not have problem but also pkg check -d -n -a shows: > > > > > > Checking all packages: 100% > > > py27-numpy is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so > > > py37-numpy is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so > > > py37-scipy is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so > > > suitesparse is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > Does py-numpy depends on math/cblas still? > > Thank you. > > Yes, I had default option NETLIB and cblas was installed but I have installed also openblas at the same time, I do not have clbla installed. Now, I cannot have both at the same time and I do not know why py-numpy is missing shared libraries which are installed. --=20 =E2=80=9CIn politics stupidity is not a handicap=E2=80=9D.=20 Napoleon Bonaparte