From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Aug 18 14:44: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA60F37B40F for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 14:44:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7ILmJS01950; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200108182148.f7ILmJS01950@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Darryl Okahata Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: secure Filesystem In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:48:59 PDT." <200108161948.MAA03510@mina.soco.agilent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 14:48:19 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The memory is not freed until you unmount (and then, the memory is > only free'd for use by other cfs mounts -- the process size does not, of > course, shrink). It doesn't? Does it just use malloc for these structs? When you say "of course", you kinda imply you're thinking of the "bad old" malloc behaviour... -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message