From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 29 7:16:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A13137B400 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 07:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hex.databits.net (hex.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADF243E4A for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 07:16:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from petef@databits.net) Received: by hex.databits.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 51CB120FA2; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:16:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 08:16:47 -0600 From: Pete Fritchman To: Max Cc: Mark Bojara , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Orinoco Ap-500 or OR-500? Message-ID: <20020729081647.A47367@absolutbsd.org> References: <008a01c23701$2e7e9da0$04ef10ac@wireless> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <008a01c23701$2e7e9da0$04ef10ac@wireless>; from max@ecotech.com.lr on Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:09:32PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ++ 29/07/02 14:09 +0100 - Max: | Unfortunately, we already have an orinico infra-structure in place. | Inter-operability may be an issue, I don't know. But would an AP-500 or an | OR-500 do the trick? AFAIK, the only difference between an AP-500 and an OR-500 is firmware. The OR-500 supports point-to-point stuff. We have a bunch of AP-500s and AP-1000s in place serving wireless to the area -- I think you'll be fine with an AP-500. --pete -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|wyom.net)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message