From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 19:41:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990581065673 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:41:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B838FC20 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id n14Jffj6016433; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:41:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n14Jff9F016432; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:41:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:41:41 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Ansar Mohammed Message-ID: <20090204194141.GA15757@alchemy.franken.de> References: <200902041711.n14HBBGt042335@www.freebsd.org> <087f01c986f4$a1bd26c0$e5377440$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <087f01c986f4$a1bd26c0$e5377440$@com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:41:43 -0000 On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 01:15:58PM -0500, Ansar Mohammed wrote: > Is mount_smbfs supported under sparc64? > Last time yongari@ and me looked into this our conclusion was that it should be okay on big-endian machines after the last round of fixes but still lacks proper handling of architectures with strict alignment requirements, YMMV. Marius