From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 19 18:43:28 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA08139
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 18:43:28 -0700
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA08133
          for <hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 18:43:26 -0700
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA21792; Wed, 19 Apr 95 19:36:52 MDT
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9504200136.AA21792@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: [DEVFS] your opinions sought!
To: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 95 19:36:51 MDT
Cc: dufault@hda.com, hackers@freefall.cdrom.com
In-Reply-To: <199504200052.TAA03382@bonkers.taronga.com> from "Peter da Silva" at Apr 19, 95 07:52:39 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Ownership and permissions should be specified by the device itself as
> > part of the registration information.
> 
> Not always practical. For example:
> 
> chgroup system /dev/tty* /dev/cua)
> chown dialer /dev/cua03
> 
> chgrp backups /dev/rsd*
> chmod g+r /dev/rsd*

Looks good.  Put it /etc/rc.dev.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.