From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 31 20:05:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB7D16A417 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0201013C478 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l6VK4DbH022405; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:04:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:04:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20070731.140413.104054619.imp@bsdimp.com> To: andrew@dobrohot.org From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <46AF933D.10602@dobrohot.org> References: <46AF933D.10602@dobrohot.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:04:14 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uscanner + HPS' usb stack + nvidia-driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:05:15 -0000 > I've tested it in -CURRENT with x11/nvidia-driver and official USB stack > - problem can't be reproduced, but scanning speed is much lower than > with HPS' USB stack. > > Is there any hope that it will be solved in the near future? Define: Much slower. With my scanner, I can't measure a difference in speed using xsane between the two, although I have done only limited testing with hps' stack. I plan on doing a bulk MFC after beta1 goes out. Warner