From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 26 05:53:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0087437B404 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 05:53:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (174.113.sn.ct.dsl.thebiz.net [216.238.113.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528F143FA3 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 05:53:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zlists@mgm51.com) Received: from ntmm (unknown [63.119.50.193]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1345229476 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:53:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <200303260853550209.039B75B6@sentry.24cl.com> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (1) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:53:55 -0500 From: "MikeM" To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3 autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Subject: Re: problem on 1TB filesystem RAID 5 3ware X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:54:00 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: |>Also, the lack of support for the current firmware on the 7000 series |>cards makes me hesitant to use those cards with FreeBSD. | |What specifically does not work with that firmware ? That is not the correct question to ask. I do not want to have to deal with a data corruption issue before I realize that I should not be using the 3Ware card under FreeBSD. The right question to ask is: do all the operational modes of the 3Ware card work properly under FreeBSD? At the moment, it appears that the answer is "no". Specifically, the RAID 5 configuration appears to result in data corruption with the current firmware. | but the driver is top notch in terms of speed and reliability In RAID 1/0 configuration, possibly. But I reamin to be convinced that your assertion carries over to the RAID 5 configuration.