From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 25 17:34:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096F3B27 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yoshi.brtsvcs.net (yoshi.brtsvcs.net [174.136.100.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B0712B4 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:880:bd0:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) by yoshi.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA623E604D; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:34:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:880:bd0:544d:1912:bbb2:dcb] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:880:bd0:544d:1912:bbb2:dcb]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32AEEBF1; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:34:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <530CD430.40607@bluerosetech.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:34:40 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Kalchev , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Import of DragonFly Mail Agent References: <20140223211155.GS1699@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <942222.61849.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <530B5DA7.1050902@digsys.bg> In-Reply-To: <530B5DA7.1050902@digsys.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:34:52 -0000 On 2/24/2014 6:56 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > One of the many problems with removing functionality is very well > illustrated by what happens now, when you upgrade an pre-10 system > running nameserver: you end up without it and eventually without your > nameserver database as well. Imagine, one day a user updates their > 10-stable to 11-stable only to find out mail is no more. I understand your point, but that would mean they didn't read the release notes or UPGRADING prior to doing so. That is not a problem we can fix in software.