From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 19 14:18:30 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093BC106566B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:18:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADD78FC19
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:18:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6JEIMZE016811;
	Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:18:22 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q6JEIMWp016808; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:18:22 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:18:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <50081545.3020306@cran.org.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207191617380.16741@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <201207190253.q6J2r3p0070058@mail.r-bonomi.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1207191014310.7414@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<50081545.3020306@cran.org.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:18:23 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: jhs@berklix.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
	Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Subject: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:18:30 -0000

>
> How about data stored in remapped sectors, or any flash cache?

how about being able to restore random 0.1% of former user data.

Not really useful.

Flash cache is quite recent idea, nobody serious would like to scrap such 
a drive instead of reuse.