From owner-cvs-other Sat Apr 22 16:02:50 1995 Return-Path: cvs-other-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA06324 for cvs-other-outgoing; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 16:02:50 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.223.46]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA06318 ; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 16:02:43 -0700 Received: from freefall.cdrom.com (freefall.cdrom.com [192.216.222.4]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA17157; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 16:04:50 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA06312 ; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 16:02:36 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr (Jean-Marc Zucconi) cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, jkh@time.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@time.cdrom.com, cvs-other@time.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: /host/freefall/a/ncvs/ports/lang/forth Makefile In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Apr 95 17:31:39 BST." <9504221631.AA14078@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 16:02:36 -0700 Message-ID: <6311.798591756@freefall.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: cvs-other-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Are you crazy guys? This change implies that PREFIX can't be set to > anything different from /usr/local. In this case it is even better to > remove all references to PREFIX and replace them with /usr/local :-( > > This is a big step backwards! Not actually.. Think about it, Jean-Marc.. What everyone's been doing up to now has been to put little rules like: pre-install: @mkdir -p ${PREFIX}/bin @mkdir -p ${PREFIX}/lib ... Into their Makefiles. Sure, they don't mention /usr/local directly, but they're creating the _same underlying hierarchy_! So you redirect your prefix to /usr/foo - you're STILL going to be expected to have things like /usr/foo/lib and /usr/foo/man/man1! All I did with the BSD.local.dist change was centralize this. It's run for ALL values of ${PREFIX} except ${X11BASE}, which we know follows a different structure and should already be created as part of the XFree86 installation (if this turns out not to be the case then we'll have to create an XFree86.dist or something!). I don't see how this constitutes a step backwards at all. Sure BSD.local.dist is inappropriately named in the case where PREFIX=/usr/foo, but it certainly doesn't bother me enough to lose sleep over. Jordan