From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 8 14:12:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DF11065674 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@lexasoft.ru) Received: from relay.wahome.ru (relay.wahome.ru [95.211.21.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985448FC19 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mmx.lexasoft.ru (mmx.lexasoft.ru [92.241.160.6]) by relay.wahome.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3566B2187; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:09:27 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [10.100.0.2] (petrovich-telecom-gw.wahome.ru [77.91.225.38]) by mmx.lexasoft.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A83142848C; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:12:23 +0400 (MSD) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Alexey Tarasov In-Reply-To: <86zl1et4rv.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:12:22 +0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1A417529-F467-4411-970A-3FF41080AC61@lexasoft.ru> <868w8yukuy.fsf@ds4.des.no> <6313EB8E-D3DA-459F-A372-0E871359FA1C@lexasoft.ru> <86zl1et4rv.fsf@ds4.des.no> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: Alexey Tarasov Subject: Re: gpart and sector size X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0000 Ok, in case of GPT? :-) GPT implementation can be the simplest solution to this problem compared = to implementing additional ATA commands to determine if disk is in = Advanced Format. On 08.04.2010, at 18:09, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > Alexey Tarasov writes: >> I mean that gpart should act like gnop presenting another sector size >> to user. I that possible at all? >=20 > That depends on the underlying partition scheme. My guess is "no". >=20 > (it all boils down to whether the desired logical sector size can > somehow be recorded on-disk) >=20 -- Alexey Tarasov (\__/)=20 (=3D'.'=3D)=20 E[: | | | | :]=D0=97=20 (")_(")