From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 16 14:03:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FEB16A4CE; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:03:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-bedford-dr.mitre.org (smtp-bedford-dr-x.mitre.org [192.160.51.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2137843D31; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:03:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jandrese@mitre.org) Received: from smtp-bedford-dr.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) i7GE3At01912; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:03:10 -0400 Received: from smtp-bedford-dr.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-bedford-dr.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA3C4F8DD; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:03:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MAILHUB1 (mailhub1.mitre.org [129.83.20.31]) i7GE3Aw01859; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:03:10 -0400 Received: from mm112324-2k.mitre.org (128.29.3.51) by mailhub1.mitre.org with SMTP id 8899666; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:03:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4120BE98.1030301@mitre.org> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:03:04 -0400 From: Jason Andresen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Murray , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <200408132000.i7DK0nTb056584@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <200408132000.i7DK0nTb056584@grimreaper.grondar.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: mem_range_attr_set undefined X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:03:11 -0000 Mark Murray wrote: >Jason Andresen writes: > > >>>Make sure you compile in the 'io' and 'mem' devices. >>> >>> >>> >>Oh, I was loading them as modules. That's probably it. >> >> > >That's crazy. Loading as modules or building them in would have >had the same result here. Did you cvsup between builds or anything? > > Nope. Was the fact that I was loading them as modules fairly late in the boot cycle (right before the Nvidia driver module was loaded) instead of in the boot loader itself perhaps the problem?