From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 10 16:54:50 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA04878 for current-outgoing; Fri, 10 May 1996 16:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA04872 for ; Fri, 10 May 1996 16:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id SAA02960; Fri, 10 May 1996 18:54:11 -0500 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199605102354.SAA02960@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: termios'ed getty To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 18:54:11 -0500 (CDT) Cc: current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199605102033.WAA25248@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at May 10, 96 10:33:30 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Um. Um. (looks for a place to hide) Can I submit a plea of no contest? > > > > I've used them... eeeeccch, makes me wanna toss, mainly when I needed to > > do something I could do no other way. > > Can't i convince to use the termios pendants instead? Is it really any better? > > I think printcap uses the sgtty options too, doesn't it (xc/xs/fc)? > > Already removed and replaced by an stty-style option list. > > (Now that gives me an idea: we should perhaps also kill the numerical > termios options in getty, and replace them by the stty-style logic > from lpd.) Now there's an idea that's worth its weight in gold. ;-) Note: I already "have" this ability because I can execute scripts via my "bx=" mechanism :-) ... Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Greco - Systems Administrator jgreco@ns.sol.net Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/546-7968