From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 19 11:20:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEF416A403 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B813613C4B9 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=daemon.micom.mng.net) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IBU3R-0000xu-AB; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:20:21 +0800 Message-ID: <469F48F4.30503@micom.mng.net> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:20:20 +0800 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sebosik@demax.sk References: <60088.158.193.82.62.1184770640.squirrel@webmail.demax.sk> <469EC8C6.6030204@micom.mng.net> <469ED672.4000506@micom.mng.net> <58121.158.193.82.62.1184833426.squirrel@webmail.demax.sk> <469F2C71.1090508@micom.mng.net> <65482.158.193.82.62.1184838359.squirrel@webmail.demax.sk> <469F33E4.2090407@micom.mng.net> <62378.158.193.82.62.1184839722.squirrel@webmail.demax.sk> <469F39D6.3070608@micom.mng.net> <55519.158.193.82.62.1184840987.squirrel@webmail.demax.sk> In-Reply-To: <55519.158.193.82.62.1184840987.squirrel@webmail.demax.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: solution for Beryl/Compiz on i945GM [try it] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:20:23 -0000 sebosik@demax.sk wrote: > Hi > > I think that it may be some kind of problem inside gnome. > Right now I`m using KDE 3.5.7 and compiz 0.5.0 from ports, and it is > working without any problem. I used GNOME some time ago(probably 2 months) > for 2 days, but it seems to me that rendering windows was slower then in > KDE. But it is only my point of view. > > > Tried xfce4. Still the same, window decorator crashes. Ganbold