Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:03:37 -0600 From: Maxime Henrion <mux@sneakerz.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Subject: Re: Patches to if_loop + the interface cloning framework Message-ID: <20020212180337.D25374@sneakerz.org> In-Reply-To: <20020212155646.A26408@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>; from brooks@one-eyed-alien.net on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:56:46PM -0800 References: <20020212154828.A25374@sneakerz.org> <20020212143909.B24768@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020212165544.B25374@sneakerz.org> <20020212153609.D24768@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020212174453.C25374@sneakerz.org> <20020212155646.A26408@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brooks Davis (brooks@one-eyed-alien.net) wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:44:53PM -0600, Maxime Henrion wrote: > > > > I've updated the patch at the same location, adding a panic() in case > > the creation of lo0 fails. I'll be interested in removing the KLD > > stuff from this file since it's not working anyway, and adds some error > > checking, but that will be a bit later ;-) > > Looks good though error checking would be nice. ;-) Actually, after taking a closer look at it, there is no error checking that can be done in locreate(). It calls if_attach() and bpfattach() which are both void functions and calls malloc() with M_WAITOK. Were you talking about something else ? > I'm not convinced > that removing the module support is a good idea. I'd much rather move > in the other direction in general. What would it be useful to, if the kernel can't link without it ? Thanks, Maxime Henrion To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020212180337.D25374>