From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Aug 21 12:19:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA13469
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA13464
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
	by mail.cdsnet.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id MAA00944
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jaye Mathisen  <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: How hard would it be for the boot blocks to validate
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970821121842.18322i-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


the integrity of the kernel binary itself?  And then possibly boot an
alternate kernel?