From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Wed Jul 19 20:57:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7248D7E2FA; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827BC6BE20; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215293F5FA; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:50:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anthias.dhcp.nue.suse.com (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 560033F5E3; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:50:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:50:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Alexander Kabaev cc: Pedro Giffuni , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/gcc6-aux for head beyond __nonnull related issues: vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t related changes (and more) In-Reply-To: <20170414201952.69ccc472@kan> Message-ID: References: <9758023E-1526-41F9-9416-6AC8AD3201B5@dsl-only.net> <20170414201952.69ccc472@kan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:57:24 -0000 On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > it was suggested multiple times that the whole fixinc step is > ultimately harmful and serves no useful purpose and probably should be > disabled in built packages outright. Is there a reason not to do it? > Even Redhat appears to do the slimming in their rpms: For the more current lang/gcc* ports (not the gcc5-aux and gcc6-aux ports which I do not maintain) I have now removed packaging the headers processed by fixincludes, so any problems in that direction should be gone. Gerald