From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 22:42:35 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E1316A421 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 796DF13C478 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 10788 invoked by uid 399); 4 Sep 2007 22:42:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 4 Sep 2007 22:42:33 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:42:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Lars Balker Rasmussen In-Reply-To: <20070904042837.GC50939@tux.nerdheaven.dk> Message-ID: References: <200709031340.l83De1Nn080354@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070904042837.GC50939@tux.nerdheaven.dk> X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:42:35 -0000 On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 04:42:43PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> How will this affect those of us who use RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES? > > backpan has latest packages as well, so it's not an added failure mode. > > I hope the added load from RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES users is miniscule for > backpan. In fact that was my biggest worry... > > In the case of when the file is only on backpan, I assume you can do no > worse than normal? Either way, it's still better than the situation without > backpan. Okey dokey. I appreciate not only the thoroughness of your response, but also that you thought it through ahead of time. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection