From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 14:14:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98083281 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [88.198.178.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D46EA2CD8 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34773 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jun 2014 14:14:00 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 34768, pid: 34770, t: 0.0447s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.3/m:55/d:19123 Received: from unknown (HELO suse3.ewadmin.local) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@212.71.117.1) by mail.ultra-secure.de with ESMTPA; 23 Jun 2014 14:14:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:13:54 +0200 From: Rainer Duffner To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/187594: [zfs] [patch] ZFS ARC behavior problem and fix Message-ID: <20140623161354.2fdd1289@suse3.ewadmin.local> In-Reply-To: <201405151530.s4FFU0d6050580@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201405151530.s4FFU0d6050580@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:14:01 -0000 Am Thu, 15 May 2014 15:30:00 GMT schrieb Karl Denninger : > The following reply was made to PR kern/187594; it has been noted by > GNATS. > > From: Karl Denninger > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: kern/187594: [zfs] [patch] ZFS ARC behavior problem and > fix Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:05:34 -0500 > > This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. > > --------------ms050404000608010301080104 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I have now been running the latest delta as posted 26 March -- it > is=20 coming up on two months now, has been stable here and I've seen > several=20 positive reports and no negative ones on impact for > others. Performance=20 continues to be "as expected." > > Is there an expectation on this being merged forward and/or MFC'd? > Hi, I'm looking into applying your patch to one of my servers. However, I've got a question: can I apply it to stock 10.0? If I need to go 10-stable, which revision do you recommend? The server in question only has 32GB of RAM and I fear that once it does NFS in addition to MySQL, it will be bogged down. Best Regards, Rainer