From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Sep 9 23:28: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.gfit.net (ns.gfit.net [209.41.124.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955ED153AD for ; Thu, 9 Sep 1999 23:27:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@embt.com) Received: from paranor (timembt.iinc.com [206.67.169.229]) by mercury.gfit.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA24735; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 01:28:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tom@embt.com) Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19990910022602.009f0100@mail.embt.com> X-Sender: tembt@mail.embt.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 02:26:02 -0400 To: Mike Nowlin From: Tom Embt Subject: Re: FreeBSD-stable on IBM Netfinity Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <19990910115619.B10017@brel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >2) Large drives being fsck'd will sometimes take longer than the timeout >-- same problem as above, but can get ugly -- fsck, timeout, reboot -- >fsck, timeout, reboot -- etc..... Adjusting the timeout fixes it, but I'm >planning a more elegant solution..... > ..like having the daemon issue some sort of "start" command when it starts, and tell the PIC not to start the countdown until it recieves this command. Just thinking aloud.. Tom Embt tom@embt.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message