Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 22:08:02 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? Message-ID: <201207050408.WAA11175@lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <4FF4BDA8.50303@FreeBSD.org> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <201207042156.PAA09080@lariat.net> <4FF4BDA8.50303@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 04:03 PM 7/4/2012, Doug Barton wrote: >Other than that, if whoever actually pushes all the rocks uphill to make >the installer more modular in this regard decides to include djbdns, >more power to them. :) I'm not suggesting that everyone will prefer djb, and the last thing I want to do is start a religious war regarding the merits of different resolvers or the efficacy of DNSSEC. I'm merely asking that any change to the base system or the installation procedure allow me to choose this or any of the other most popular resolvers, at install time, with as little pain as possible. --Brett Glass
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201207050408.WAA11175>