From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Oct 26 18:51: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113CD37B9AA; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id C2C8314C2E; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 03:47:33 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: John Baldwin Cc: Mike Smith , Bakul Shah , Poul-Henning Kamp , Peter Wemm , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Matthew Dillon Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 27 Oct 2001 03:47:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Baldwin writes: > My bad. C90 requires that time_t fit into a long according to > Garrett. Maybe it does. Maybe it doesn't. Chapter and verse, please. All I have is the final draft of C99, and all it says about the width of time_t is that it is an arithmetic type "capable of representing times" (7.23.1). There is no mention at all of the word "long" in section 7.23. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message