From nobody Thu Oct 14 13:24:18 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D6F17F0234 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HVVVY70qmz3M3r; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:24:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.24.42.13] (host-95-250-211-60.retail.telecomitalia.it [95.250.211.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: madpilot/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 782762E0C; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:24:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <31a01109-99db-0806-7b5c-bb4603315a44@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:24:18 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: Adding CPE information Content-Language: en-US To: Yasuhiro Kimura , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20211014.200731.1708218659985202223.yasu@FreeBSD.org> From: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: <20211014.200731.1708218659985202223.yasu@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 14/10/21 13:07, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: > Hello, > > It seems recently some committers are working to add CPE information > to many ports. I don't know why it started. But if it is intended to > add CPE information to all (or most of ) ports, isn't it better to > modify ports framework so CPE intormation is added to each ports by > default? AFAIK that's already in the tree. The framework tries to extrapolate CPE information from PORTNAME and other variables. Unluckily most of the time it is actually impossible to get correct information and some other variables with the correct details, which are not necessarily logical or in any way connected with the information already present) need to be added by hand after manual discovery. -- Guido Falsi